-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[runtime][refactor] Unify vm and interpreter objects #4693
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
zhiics
force-pushed
the
unify_interpreter_vm
branch
2 times, most recently
from
January 13, 2020 04:24
88c6be4
to
9843014
Compare
zhiics
force-pushed
the
unify_interpreter_vm
branch
from
January 14, 2020 01:14
9843014
to
e6c8347
Compare
ping reviewers. |
tqchen
requested changes
Jan 15, 2020
zhiics
force-pushed
the
unify_interpreter_vm
branch
2 times, most recently
from
January 15, 2020 23:39
72d2b4c
to
1c5d210
Compare
would be great if @wweic can also take a look |
I'll take a look soon. |
jroesch
reviewed
Jan 16, 2020
cc @MarisaKirisame and @slyubomirsky |
zhiics
force-pushed
the
unify_interpreter_vm
branch
from
January 16, 2020 22:01
1c5d210
to
040a532
Compare
tqchen
approved these changes
Jan 17, 2020
wweic
approved these changes
Jan 17, 2020
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm. just a small typo
wweic
approved these changes
Jan 17, 2020
icemelon
reviewed
Jan 17, 2020
zhiics
force-pushed
the
unify_interpreter_vm
branch
from
January 17, 2020 19:10
05113a5
to
b4347a6
Compare
icemelon
approved these changes
Jan 17, 2020
Thanks for the change. It now look right. |
MarisaKirisame
approved these changes
Jan 18, 2020
Thanks @zhiics @tqchen @wweic @jroesch @MarisaKirisame . This is now merged. |
This was referenced Jan 19, 2020
alexwong
pushed a commit
to alexwong/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 26, 2020
* unify vm and interpreter objects * move closure back vm * adt/closure back to vm.adt/vm.closure * closure base
alexwong
pushed a commit
to alexwong/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2020
* unify vm and interpreter objects * move closure back vm * adt/closure back to vm.adt/vm.closure * closure base
zhiics
added a commit
to neo-ai/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 2, 2020
* unify vm and interpreter objects * move closure back vm * adt/closure back to vm.adt/vm.closure * closure base
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR:
Unifies the Closure objects used by VM and interpreter. Refactored the interpreter to be able to use the same Closure object.
Replaces the TupleValue objects with ADT
Cleans the vmobj code and makes ADT not specific to the vm namespace.
cc @tqchen @jroesch @wweic @icemelon9